New site? Maybe some day.
Username:
SPAM Filter:
re-type this
(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Select Color
orange
orange-red
crimson
red
firebrick
dark red
green
limegreen
teal
silver
sea-green
deeppink
tomato
coral
purple
indigo
burlywood
sandy brown
sienna
chocolate
FONT
XXSmall
XSmall
Small
Medium
Large
XL
XXL
:DG:
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Char
†
‡
‰
♠
♣
♥
♦
‾
←
↑
→
↓
™
–
—
¡
¢
£
¤
¥
¦
§
¨
©
ª
«
¬
®
¯
°
±
²
³
´
µ
¶
·
¸
¹
º
»
¼
½
¾
¿
À
Á
Â
Ã
Ä
Å
Æ
Ç
È
É
Ê
Ë
Ì
Í
Î
Ï
Ð
Ñ
Ò
Ó
Ô
Õ
Ö
×
Ø
Ù
Ú
Û
Ü
Ý
Þ
ß
à
á
â
ã
ä
å
æ
ç
è
é
ê
ë
ì
í
î
ï
ð
ñ
ò
ó
ô
õ
ö
÷
ø
ù
ú
û
ü
ý
þ
ÿ
b
i
u
add:
url
image
video
(
?
)
Message:
you are ab-using [QUOTE]blah blah blah[/QUOTE] to reply to corpus_colloidal.
Please remove excess text as not to re-post tons
[QUOTE="corpus_colloidal:870173"][QUOTE="porphyria:870152"][QUOTE="orgymf@work:870121"][QUOTE="timma:869105"]I like Obama, and I think he's a major upgrade from Bush.[/QUOTE] i think this needs to stop. everyone keeps saying "he's better than bush" "he's a step up from W" etc. listen, that means nothing! saying better than bush is like saying thinner than me..most people are it's like saying "more comfortable than jerking off with sandpaper" most things are. see what i mean?[/QUOTE] what's the matter saying something is a major upgrade or better than something else when it clearly IS? most people are thinner than you and probably get way hotter chicks. compared to bush, obama is like jerking off with ky jelly compared to sandpaper. you can keep the sandpaper, kthnx![/QUOTE] Spoken like a new school, bleeding heart dem. enjoi your bi-partisan beat off fest... When are people going to understand that the scaffolding of the American government it self, will never let one man (a president) deviate too far from the special interests of a very small percentage of the country. Especially considering whats at stake for this country with the foreign climate, and the current financial mess. The forefathers of this country were radical cats who had the fortitude to make actual change regardless of agenda. Yes! They were slave owners. Yes they drove the indians to the near corners of their own country (i.e: trail of tears etc..BUT not the point) whats more important is that these men were establishing a government that was clearly undefined and more malleable--thereby giving them the opportunity to make legit "change." If you equate change with something as 'mechanismal' as someone's diction, rhetoric and skin color then you may as well return to the flock. Meet the new boss...same as the old boss. My prediction for 09? No foreign attacks. No failures. Just a suffer fest, as was alluded to in his inaugural speech when he quoted G. Washington.[/QUOTE]
UBB
enabled
. HTML
disabled
Spam Filtering
enabled
Icons: (click image to insert)
Show All
-
pop
[
default homepage
]
[
print
][
1:57:27am Jun 02,2024
load time 0.00927 secs/10 queries]
[
search
]
[
refresh page
]