Home News Events Bands Labels Venues Pics MP3s Radio Show Reviews Releases Buy$tuff Forum   Classifieds   News   Localband   Shows   Show Pics   Polls      OT Threads   Other News   Movies   VideoGames   Videos   TV   Sports   Gear   /r/   Food      New Thread   New Poll Miscellaneous Links E-mail Search login

New site? Maybe some day. Username: SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F) Message: UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop Select Color orange orange-red crimson red firebrick dark red green limegreen teal silver sea-green deeppink tomato coral purple indigo burlywood sandy brown sienna chocolate FONTXXSmallXSmallSmallMediumLargeXLXXL :DG: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Char† ‡ ‰ ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦ ‾ ← ↑ → ↓ ™ – —   ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ § ¨ © ª « ¬ ­ ® ¯ ° ± ² ³ ´ µ ¶ · ¸ ¹ º » ¼ ½ ¾ ¿ À Á Â Ã Ä Å Æ Ç È É Ê Ë Ì Í Î Ï Ð Ñ Ò Ó Ô Õ Ö × Ø Ù Ú Û Ü Ý Þ ß à á â ã ä å æ ç è é ê ë ì í î ï ð ñ ò ó ô õ ö ÷ ø ù ú û ü ý þ ÿ b i u  add: url  image  video(?) : post by the_reverend at 2003-09-08 22:29:09 get a 50mm 1.8 first ($100 brand new) and then look at other lenses. also, make sure you if you get a zoom lens, make is a f-2.8 or lower lens. 3.5 and up sux balls unless you are going to be out side in bright light shooting. lens 24mm 1.8 (sigma) f 2.0 @ 1/15 freaking low lighting ISO 1000 lens 28-70mm 2.8 (sigma) f2.8 @ 1/30 semi-low lighting ISO 800 all the other pictures on this site (after 2/21/03) are with my 17-35mm f2.8-4. it's awesome at 17mm in low light, aove 20mm (f 3.3) it sucks. and in lots of lighting it sucks. Succubus has the 24-70mm 2.8 sigma lens. it's alot bigger than my 28-70 2.8, and gives you a touch more in the wide end.

[default homepage]

[print][

10:24:25pm Jun 02,2024 load time 0.00688 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]